🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.